49

In this blog post , I am sharing the best Free AI chatbots you can use currently which can help you increase productivity , efficiency or help in your day to day activities. With AI chatbots you need to start using them to actually know how useful they can be. The AI chatbots work based on the large amount of data that has been collected, the algorithm scans through this data and gives you a best possible answer. You can ask these AI chatbots general questions or even can ask them to write a software code for you. These chatbots are free to you but you can upgrade to a paid plan for improved features.

ChatGPT

ChatGPT consistently maintains a leading position on the LM Arena leaderboard, surpassing other models in essential benchmarks. As of October 2024, it stands as the most widely used AI application globally, boasting 200 million users.

I have extensively utilized ChatGPT for various purposes, including brainstorming, translation, coding, AI script generation, data analysis, and managing research-intensive tasks. The new 4o model represents a substantial advancement—it operates with remarkable speed and demonstrates a level of intelligence that surpasses all prior versions of ChatGPT.

With the multimodal capabilities of ChatGPT-4, I can input images, such as charts or graphs, and pose questions regarding them, facilitating a quicker interpretation of visual data. For example, I submitted a PNG image of a chart, and it analyzed the data, provided a table of the raw information extracted from the image, and recreated the chart in my preferred color scheme—truly impressive.

ChatGPT now possesses the ability to retain context over time, allowing it to personalize responses based on earlier interactions. For instance, I have leveraged it to refine ongoing project ideas without the need to reiterate every detail, thereby saving considerable time. Users can review and manage the information it retains through OpenAI’s controls, ensuring it remains within appropriate boundaries.

The integrated search feature within ChatGPT (more details to follow) enhances the ease of locating relevant information during conversations, thereby reducing inaccuracies through the use of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). RAG enhances the AI’s responses by sourcing information from external databases.

While ChatGPT excels in creative and general tasks, I would suggest considering alternative tools like Claude for coding purposes. This is not to imply that ChatGPT is inadequate for coding tasks; rather, Claude demonstrates exceptional proficiency in that area.

The ChatGPT-4o mini is accessible to all users at no cost, while the Plus plan is available for $20 per month, which I believe is a worthwhile investment.

Claude

I have been utilizing Claude, created by Anthropic, for various coding assignments, and it is rapidly becoming my preferred choice for code evaluations. What distinguishes Claude is its remarkable precision; it appears to comprehend the intricacies of programming more effectively than other tools I have experimented with. I have employed it to identify subtle errors in my code and to generate improved strategies for project organization. Anthropic is enhancing these models with more current and specialized coding knowledge, which is evident, particularly when addressing modern frameworks or resolving complex bugs.

Additionally, I appreciate the conversational quality of Claude. It possesses a certain warmth that makes interactions feel more engaging compared to ChatGPT, resulting in smoother dialogues. Whether I am exchanging ideas or navigating a challenging problem, the experience is genuinely enjoyable. While I have not yet developed a profound attachment to Claude, I am certainly moving in that direction.

However, I have encountered response and rate limits more frequently than I would prefer, which can be inconvenient when I am deeply involved in a project. Nevertheless, at $20 per month for the Pro plan, it remains an excellent value, particularly for those seeking an intelligent, friendly AI assistant with a strong emphasis on coding tasks.

Gemini

Google’s Gemini integrates smoothly into the Google ecosystem, making it feel like a natural extension of Android rather than just another app. For anyone already using Google Workspace, it’s especially convenient. Whether I was composing emails, summarizing articles, or asking random questions, it responded quickly and efficiently.

I’ve discovered some unexpected uses as well. For example, when reviewing legal documents, I’d go through them once and then ask Gemini to check for anything I might have missed. Another time, while shopping for clothes, I couldn’t make sense of a confusing sizing chart. I took a photo of the label, shared my usual size, and let Gemini take care of the rest. Its suggestion was perfect, and I ended up with exactly the right fit.

Gemini really stands out for creative work too. I uploaded an image I liked, asked it to describe it for an AI image generator prompt, and the results were both creative and inspiring, making it a great tool for brainstorming fresh ideas.

While working on a project proposal, Gemini Advanced provided nuanced and tailored feedback that truly boosted my productivity. It even helped with copywriting, generating polished text for design mockups instead of relying on filler text like “Lorem Ipsum.”

That said, it’s not without its flaws. One issue I encountered was its context retention. When revising a piece of writing, I found myself repeating instructions because it sometimes forgot previous conversations. Similarly, when I uploaded an Excel file, got a summary, and then updated the data, Gemini treated the new file as a completely fresh task, ignoring the earlier work.

Another area for improvement is its performance with technical tasks. While it does well with simple code formatting and debugging, it occasionally converted JavaScript into Python unnecessarily. For more complex subjects, like legal texts, its analysis didn’t always dive as deep as I expected. Even its responses to some image-related queries were occasionally off, which was disappointing given its creative capabilities elsewhere.

Despite these drawbacks, Gemini’s strengths far outweigh its weaknesses. Its seamless integration with Google tools makes it an invaluable asset for anyone within the Google ecosystem, and its versatility with both text and images makes it a great tool for creative endeavors. While it’s not the ideal choice for highly specialized or technical tasks, it’s a fast, reliable assistant for everyday use—and the advanced features have made it a tool I now rely on.

The free Basic version (using the 1.5 Flash model) meets most casual needs, but the $19.99/month Gemini Advanced provides access to the more powerful 1.5 Pro and Gemini-Exp-1206 models, which are perfect for tasks like coding, math, and in-depth research, including analyzing documents up to 1,500 pages.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek is definitely worth exploring. They offer free access to their V3 and new R1 models directly on their website, though API access still requires a paid plan (but it’s very affordable).

What sets DeepSeek apart is how engaging its search feels, even after just a few uses. The transparency of the tool—showing its reasoning and clearly stating what it knows and what it doesn’t—helps build a strong sense of trust with users.

In January 2025, DeepSeek launched their R1 model as a direct competitor to ChatGPT’s o1, quickly catching the attention of the AI community due to its cost-effectiveness and open-source nature. I’ve spent some time testing both the R1 and V3 models.

I had both ChatGPT-o1 and DeepSeek-R1 analyze sections of a presentation I’m working on. The R1 model offered a much more thorough analysis, covering key points that o1 missed. I also asked both to brainstorm ideas, and once again, R1 provided much stronger suggestions than o1.

For coding, I’ve been leaning more toward DeepSeek (V3) lately because of its direct, to-the-point suggestions. In comparison, Claude (3.5 Sonnet) tends to offer more detailed solutions and takes a broader approach, favoring the one that aligns most closely with best software engineering practices. Both tools are excellent in their own right, and I now use them interchangeably. DeepSeek excels in affordability and efficiency, while Claude is perfect for double-checking critical code to ensure everything is flawless. Together, they make an effective pair.

When it comes to writing, however, I’m not as fond of the DeepSeek models. I find their output to be less natural and often repetitive or dull.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Free AI chatbots represent a significant advancement in technology, transforming the way we interact with machines and access information. Their ability to provide instant responses, streamline customer service, and assist with a variety of tasks makes them invaluable across many industries. While there are still challenges to address, such as enhancing their understanding of complex queries and improving emotional intelligence, the potential for AI chatbots to evolve and integrate into our daily lives continues to grow. As AI continues to advance, we can expect chatbots to become even more intuitive, efficient, and essential to both businesses and individuals. Our personal favorite AI chatbot has been ChatGPT, but the release of DeepSeek AI has startled everyone especially its app version on apple store has exceeded number of downloads as compared to ChatGPT downloads. Let us know what you think about AI chatbots, which is your favorite and what is your usecase for using them ?